Effect of Laser Photobiomodulation on Postoperative Pain in Endodontics: A Systematic Review.

Objective: Photobiomodulation therapy has proven benefits in various dental treatments. The current systematic review aims to explore the role of laser photobiomodulation in modulating postoperative pain followed by endodontic treatment. Methods: In this systematic review, randomized controlled clinical trials on low-level laser therapy/photobiomodulation in endodontic therapy were analyzed. Database search was performed in PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, followed by literature search in Google Scholar. Results: A total of 12 studies were included as per the set criteria. The included studies utilized diode laser (808-970 nm) and indium gallium aluminum. All the included studies evaluated postendodontic pain after root canal therapy and endodontic surgery. A majority of the included studies showed significant benefits of photobiomodulation in postoperative pain management in endodontic therapy.Heterogeneity of the laser parameters and lack of power calculations for sampling among the included studies preclude solid recommendation of use of photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) for postendodontic pain management. Conclusions: Although PBMT has proven potential benefits being a possible adjunct in postoperative pain management in endodontic therapy, it requires robust standardized randomized control trials to confirm the results of the systematic review.

Comparison of the effect of photobiomodulation therapy and Ibuprofen on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment: randomized, controlled, clinical study.

The aim of the study was to compare the effect of Ibuprofen and the application of photobiomodulation therapy protocol on the reduction of postoperative pain in endodontically treated teeth using a randomized clinical trial design. Seventy patients, diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis, were selected. Treatment was performed by a single operator; a reciprocal system was used to prepare the canals; they were obturated using the Tagger's hybrid technique and coronally sealed with glass-ionomer cement. After treatment, patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. In the active control group, two Ibuprofen 600 mg tablets were administered within a 12-h interval. In the photobiomodulation therapy group, the irradiation was applied after treatment. The evaluation of postoperative pain was performed by another researcher blinded to the groups at 6, 12, 24, and 72 h intervals after treatment. To measure the outcome, two pain scales were used: numerical rate scale (NRS) and verbal rate scale (VRS). Data were analyzed using the chi-square, Mann-Whitney, and Wilcoxon paired tests. Outcome was superior with photobiomodulation therapy at 6 h (p < 0.001), 12 h (p = 0.005), and 24 h (p < 0.001) intervals compared with Ibuprofen. The results for the 72 h (p = 0.317) interval were similar, both in the VRS and NRS scales. It may be concluded that the use of photobiomodulation therapy was effective in reducing pain within the first 24 h when compared with the administration of Ibuprofen 600 mg.

Low-level laser therapy improves pain in postcesarean section: a randomized clinical trial.

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on immediate postpartum pain relief during cesarean section. A randomized, parallel controlled trial was carried out. In total, 88 women with immediate postpartum were divided into 4 groups: control group (n = 22), placebo group (n = 22), experimental group I (n = 22, dose of 4 J/cm2), and experimental group II (n = 22, dose of 2 J/cm2). The pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), algometry, and Global Change Perception Scale (GCPS) was assessed at 12, 20-24, and 44-48 h postpartum. Two LLLT sessions were performed at 12 and 24 h postpartum. A significant interaction was observed between time versus group for NRS F (2.40) = 36.80, p < 0.001 and algometry F (1.70) = 27.18, p < 0.001. GCPS revealed a significant difference between the groups during second (p = 0.04) and third evaluation (p = 0.04). The NRS and algometry presented a large effect size for the experimental groups. LLLT is an efficient method to reduce pain and enhance the GCP in postcesarean section. No significant clinical differences were found between the laser doses.

Photobiomodulation Therapy in Oral Medicine: A Guide for the Practitioner with Focus on New Possible Protocols.

Photobiomodulation (PBM) is the term to define the wide range of laser applications using low-energy densities and based on photochemical mechanisms where the energy is transferred to the intracellular mitochondrial chromophores and respiratory chain components. In literature, a great number of works are reported showing the advantages of PBM use in many oral diseases such as recurrent aphthous stomatitis, herpes infections, mucositis, and burning mouth syndrome. Different factors may explain the increasing reported use of PBM in oral medicine: the absence of side effects, the possibility of safely treating compromised patients such as oncologic patients, the possibility of a noninvasive approach not associated with pain or discomfort, and the possibility of performing short sessions. The review's aim is to describe the possible applications of PBM in oral medicine, giving practitioners simple guide for practice together with the information of a new treatment possibility "at home" performed by the patient himself under supervision.

Effect of photobiomodulation therapy on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment: a randomized, controlled, clinical study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective, randomized, clinical study was to assess the effect of photobiomodulation therapy (PBM) with low-level laser irradiation (LLLI) on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty patients, diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis in lower molar teeth, participated in the study. All treatments were performed by a single operator. Participants were randomly divided into two groups: in the experimental group (EG), endodontic treatment was performed with a reciprocating system, immediately followed by PBM with LLLI; and only endodontic treatment was performed in the control group (CG). Postoperative pain was assessed by a second examiner, who was blinded, using two scales: verbal rating scale (VRS) and numerical rating scale (NRS). Assessment was carried out at 6, 12, and 24 h after treatment. Data were analyzed using chi-squared, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney tests, ordinal, and non-parametric regression analyses. RESULTS: For the prevalence of pain, the difference between the groups was significant for the evaluations performed after 6 h (p = 0.04) and 24 h (p = 0.02). The difference after 24 h remained significant after stratification by sex and extrusion of filling material. Increased pain intensity was associated with extrusion of root canal filling material to the periapical region in the two scales used. CONCLUSION: The effect of PBM therapy after endodontic treatment showed a significant decreasein prevalence of postoperative pain. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The PBM reduces the prevalence of postoperative pain and may benefit patients who need endodontic treatment.

Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Postoperative Pain in Molars with Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: In this clinical trial, we evaluated the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on postoperative pain in mandibular molar teeth with symptomatic apical periodontitis. METHODS: Forty-two patients were included in the study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Root canal treatment was conducted using reciprocating instruments. The patients were randomly distributed into 3 groups using a Web program as follows: control (no laser was applied), placebo (mock laser therapy), and LLLT. Postoperative pain levels on the 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 30th day and postoperative percussion pain levels on the visual analog scale were recorded. The chi-square, 1-way analysis of variance, and least significant difference post hoc tests were performed to analyze the data (P = .05). RESULTS: LLLT resulted in lower pain levels than those noted in the control and placebo groups on days 1 and 3 (P < .05). There were no significant differences among the placebo, LLLT, and control groups in terms of postoperative percussion pain levels (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: LLLT can be beneficial in reducing postoperative pain in endodontics.

Evaluating the effect of photobiomodulation with a 940-nm diode laser on post-operative pain in periodontal flap surgery.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of low-power of 940-nm diode laser on post-operative pain after undisplaced flap surgery. This randomized clinical trial study was conducted using a split-mouth design. The study participants comprised 30 patients who needed periodontal flap surgery for periodontal pockets on the same tooth on both sides of the mandible. One side of the mandible was subjected to undisplaced flap surgery plus treatment with a 940-nm diode laser, and on the contralateral side, the surgery was conducted without applying the laser. Patients received anti-inflammatory medication and analgesics after surgery. The patients were asked to report the number of analgesics they took and the pain they experienced each night for 1 week using a visual analogue scale. An independent-sample t test was used to compare the results between the two groups. Patients reported less pain on days 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 after surgery in the laser-treated group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, fewer analgesics were used in this group on days 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 following the surgery (p < 0.05). The 940-nm diode laser with the settings used in this study could significantly reduce pain and the number of analgesics taken by patients after undisplaced flap surgery.

Evaluation of the Effect of Phototherapy in Patients with Mandibular Fracture on Mandibular Dynamics, Pain, Edema, and Bite Force: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of phototherapy on bite force, facial swelling, mandibular movements, and pain in patients having undergone surgical treatment for mandibular fractures. BACKGROUND: These are among the predominant types of facial fractures, and treatment involving surgical fixation with titanium plates is one of the most common procedures in oral-maxillofacial surgery. Phototherapy has been used to accelerate the muscle healing process and significantly improves muscle regeneration by inducing the formation of new muscle fibers. METHODS: The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1-active phototherapy, and Group 2-sham phototherapy. Both groups underwent the surgical procedure by the same surgeon using the same surgical technique. Dosimetric parameters are wavelength, 660 nm; power, 108 mW; radiant energy, 21.6 J; fluency, 21.6 J/cm2; radiance, 38197 mW/cm2; exposure time, 200 sec per point, 10 points bilaterally. Photobiomodulation was performed in 15 sessions. RESULTS: The primary variable was bite force measured with a gnathodynamometer and the secondary variables were facial swelling, mandibular movements (measured with digital calipers), and pain. The Student's t-test was used to determine intergroup differences. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest improvements in the laser group in comparison with the sham group with regard to mandibular dynamics, a reduction in postoperative facial swelling, a reduction in pain, and an increase in bite force.

Low-level laser therapy for treatment of neurosensory disorders after orthognathic surgery: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Low-level laser has been widely used in Dentistry and many studies have focused on its application in oral surgeries. This study was conducted with the aim of searching for scientific evidence concerning the effectiveness of laser to reduce pain or paresthesia related to orthognathic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An electronic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, LILACS, SciELO, CENTRAL, Google Scholar, OpenGrey, and ClinicalTrials.gov, up to November 2016, with no restrictions on language or year of publication. Additionally, a hand search of the reference list of the selected studies was carried out. The PICOS strategy was used to define the eligibility criteria and only randomized clinical trials were selected. RESULTS: Out of 1,257 identified citations, three papers fulfilled the criteria and were included in the systematic review. The risk of bias was assessed according to the Cochrane Guidelines for Clinical Trials and results were exposed based on a descriptive analysis. One study showed that laser therapy was effective to reduce postoperative pain 24 hours (P=0.007) and 72 hours (P=0.007) after surgery. Other study revealed the positive effect of laser to improve neurosensory recovery 60 days after surgery, evaluated also by the two-point discrimination (P=0.005) and sensory (P=0.008) tests. The third study reported an improvement for general sensibility of 68.75% for laser group, compared with 21.43% for placebo (P=0.0095), six months after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Individual studies suggested a positive effect of low-level laser therapy on reduction of postoperative pain and acceleration of improvement of paresthesia related to orthognathic surgery. However, due to the insufficient number and heterogeneity of studies, a meta-analysis evaluating the outcomes of interest was not performed, and a pragmatic recommendation about the use of laser therapy is not possible. This systematic review was conducted according to the statements of PRISMA and was registered at PROSPERO under the number CRD42016043258.

Effect of laser photobiomodulation on wound healing and postoperative pain following free gingival graft: A split-mouth triple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Free gingival graft (FGG) is one of the most predictable techniques for gingival augmentation. However, patient's discomfort and pain during healing period are significant concerns. The aim of this study was to assess if laser photobiomodulation (PBM) was effective in terms of enhancing wound healing and reducing postoperative pain. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twelve patients participated in this split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Each patient had a 30-day interval between the two procedures. In the test group, donor and recipient sites received diode laser (660nm, 200mW, continuous mode, time of irradiation:32s, energy density: 4J/cm2, spot size:0.5cm) immediately after FGG surgery, and 1,2,4 and 7days later. The control side received the same sequence of irradiation with the laser-off. Complete wound epithelialization of donor site and clinical wound healing and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of donor and recipient sites were evaluated after surgery. RESULTS: At 14 and 21days after surgery, the number of donor sites with complete epithelialization was greater in laser group compared to the placebo. After 21days, all donor sites in the test group were epithelialized completely, while at the same time, only eight donor sites in the control group showed complete epithelialization (P value=0.05). In terms of clinical healing of the recipient and donor sites, the test and control groups did not show any significant difference during the 45-day period, except at days 1 (for recipient site) and 14 (for donor site), when the test group showed better results (P values: 0.01 and 0.03, respectively). The VAS pain score did not show statistically significant difference between two groups during the study period, except for the first 3h after procedure when laser group showed greater VAS pain score (P values<0.05). CONCLUSION: PBM following FGG procedure with the parameters used in this study could accelerate the rate of epithelialization at the donor site. However, it did not reduce postoperative pain.

The Effects of Transcutaneous and Intraoral Low-Level Laser Therapy After Extraction of Lower Third Molars: A Randomized Single Blind, Placebo Controlled Dual-Center Study.

OBJECTIVE AND BACKGROUND: The surgical removal of impacted third molars is one of the most common procedures performed by oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The purpose of this study is to determine whether either transcutaneous or intraoral low-level laser therapy (LLLT) reduces postoperative pain and assists in the healing of mandibular third molar extraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized, placebo controlled, single-blind, split-mouth design study was conducted on 60 patients with full bony impacted similar position mandibular third molars bilaterally. The patients were divided into two groups of 30 each: transcutaneous LLLT and intraoral LLLT and the other side of each group treated with nonactive laser (60 teeth). The laser treatment consisted of administering laser energy immediately before and after the extraction procedure with gallium aluminum arsenide (GaAlAs) 830 nm diode lasers. Postoperative pain and healing of the sockets were compared in transcutaneous and intraoral group with placebo for 1 week following the extraction. Descriptive and bivariate statistics was computed, and the p-value was set at 0.05. RESULTS: Intraoral LLLT application resulted in a statistically significant reduction of postoperative pain in comparison with transcutaneous laser group and placebo. The unhealed socket numbers were compared in two groups at seventh day and no differences were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that single-session intraoral LLLT is more effective than extraoral application for reducing postoperative pain. It was postulated that the differences between skin and mucosa could have effect on the results. Although intraoral use would allow closer application to the surgical site, the size of some laser devices precludes their use intraorally.

Effect of low-level laser therapy on pain and perineal healing after episiotomy: A triple-blind randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Episiotomy is associated with perineal pain and healing complications. The low-level laser therapy (LLLT) reduces pain and inflammation and stimulates the healing process. This study aimed to assess the effect of LLLT on pain and perineal healing after an episiotomy. DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized, triple-blind, parallel clinical trial with 54 postpartum women who had a spontaneous birth with a right mediolateral episiotomy. The women were randomized into two groups: the experimental group (applications of LLLT n = 29) or the placebo group (simulated LLLT applications n = 25). Three sessions of real or sham irradiation were performed at 6-10 hours after normal birth, and the 2nd and 3rd applications were performed at 20-24 hours and 40-48 hours after the first session, respectively. Perineal pain was recorded using a Numeric Scale ranging from 0 to 10 (0 = absence and 10 = worst pain). Perineal healing was assessed using the redness, oedema, ecchymosis, discharge, and approximation (REEDA) scale. Both groups were assessed four times: in each of the three LLLT sessions and at 7-10 days after normal birth. The groups were compared using the Student's t, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding perineal healing after LLLT. The perineal pain scores were statistically higher in the experimental group in the first assessment and after the third LLLT. There was no significant difference between the groups related to the perineal pain scores 7-10 days after normal birth. CONCLUSION: The use of LLLT does not provide any benefit for treating postpartum perineal trauma using these specific protocol and parameters. Lasers Surg. Med. 49:181-188, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The effectiveness of low-level laser on postoperative pain and edema in secondary palatal operation.

OBJECTIVE: The postoperative period after palatal surgery is usually very painful, requiring the use of pain-relieving drugs. Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) in post-operative pain control and edema after secondary palatal operations. METHODS: A randomized double blinded clinical study on 20 children undergoing secondary palatal operations between 2013 and 2015 was done. Patients were randomly divided on two groups 10 patients each. In one group patients received local application of therapeutic laser immediately after surgery while patients received nothing in the control group. The mean age was 5.22 years ± 2.53 SD in the laser group and 6.42 years ± 0.76 in the control group. Postoperative pain was assessed by using visual analog scale scores and by recording the need of analgesics. The degree of postoperative edema was also recorded. RESULTS: The pain scale showed significantly less postoperative pain in the laser group than in the control group from the first day (P-value = 0.006) to the 6th day (P-value = 0.014). The number of postoperative analgesic doses needed were significantly less in the laser group in the second and third days (P-value = 0.014). The postoperative edema was significantly higher in the control group from the 2nd (P-value = 0.004) to the 7th (P-value = 0.014) postoperative days. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary results showed that low-level laser therapy is effective in the reduction of postoperative pain and edema, and minimizing the need of analgesic medication after secondary palatal operations.

Evaluation of the effects of the low-level laser therapy on swelling, pain, and trismus after removal of impacted lower third molar.

BACKGROUND: In current study we aimed to examine the effect of a low-level laser therapy on the pain, mouth opening and swelling of patients whose impacted 3rd molar tooth was extracted in addition measurement volumetrically to the edema with 3dMD face system. METHODS: It was surveyed 15 patients who had bilateral symmetric lower 3rd molars. Surgical sides of patients were randomly separated into two groups: the study group and the control group. It was applied extra oral low-level laser therapy (LLLT, 0.3 W, 40 s, 4 J/cm(2)) to the study group (n = 15) after the surgical operation and on the 2nd day. Only routine postoperative recommendation (ice application) was made in the control (n = 15) group. The maximum mouth opening, pain level and facial swelling evaluated. 3dMD Face® (3dMD, Atlanta, GA) Photogrammetric System was used to evaluate volumetric changes of the swelling. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in the edema and interincisal opening between the groups and the pain level in the laser group was significantly lower than in the control group on the 7(th) postoperative day. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were decreasing trismus, swelling, and pain level, with this LLLT, there was significant difference only in the 7th day pain level in the laser group compared with the control group.

Thermographic and clinical evaluation of 808-nm laser photobiomodulation effects after third molar extraction.

BACKGROUND: A randomized, blind, controlled clinical study was conducted with a convenience sample of 24 patients to evaluate the effectiveness of an aluminum gallium arsenide (AlGaAs) infrared laser 808 nm after third molar extraction by the use of infrared thermography technique. METHODS: Patients were divided into four groups: erupted third molars were extracted from the patients in Group I and Group II, and impacted third molars were extracted from the patients in Group III and Group IV. Group I and Group III received mock laser therapy in which the device was powered off, and Group II and Group IV were exposed to laser light. Postoperative clinical parameters related to the third molar extraction were evaluated; these parameters included pain, trismus and edema. Circulatory patterns were also evaluated by infrared thermography that exhibited local temperature coefficient at different postoperative periods. RESULTS: A slight improvement was observed for swelling, pain and trismus in patients who received laser irradiation, although the differences were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Laser therapy had a significant influence on the local circulation in the area near the temporomandibular joint, as determined by infrared thermography (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Laser therapy was able to change the local circulation, although it did not significantly influence swelling, pain or trismus during the postoperative period.

Is Low-Level Laser Therapy Effective in the Management of Pain and Swelling After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery?

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on decreasing pain and swelling after removal of impacted third molars. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, double-blinded, split-mouth study included patients presenting 2 symmetrically impacted mandibular third molars. In each participant, one side was randomly assigned to laser treatment and the other side received placebo. LLLT was performed by intraoral application of a 660-nm laser (200 mW, 6 J per point at 4 points) followed by extraoral application of an 810-nm laser (200 mW, 6 J per point at 3 points). Irradiation at the 810-nm wavelength was repeated on days 2 and 4 after surgery. On the control side, the treatment protocol was similar to the experimental side, but with laser simulation. The main outcomes were the degree of pain during the next 7 days and the edema coefficients on days 2, 4, and 7 after surgery. Data were analyzed using generalized linear models to determine the effect of group and time on pain level and edema coefficients. RESULTS: The final sample consisted of 40 patients. Pain level was significantly lower in the laser than in the placebo side at all time points during the experiment (P < .05). Swelling was significantly lower in the laser than in the placebo group on days 2, 4, and 7 after surgery (P < .05). CONCLUSION: LLLT proved effective in decreasing the intensity of pain and swelling after removal of impacted third molars and can be recommended to alleviate patients' symptoms after surgery.

Assessment of feasibility and efficacy of Class IV laser therapy for postoperative pain relief in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery patients: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Laser therapy, for its established analgesic properties with minimal side effects, has been used for the treatment of chronic pain. However, it has not been used for the treatment of acute postoperative pain. This pilot study was designed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of Class IV laser on postoperative pain relief following off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCABG) surgery, as a component of multimodal analgesia (MMA) technique. METHODS: This open observational prospective study comprised of 100 adult patients (84 male, 16 female) who underwent OPCABG through sternotomy. For postoperative analgesia, they were subjected to laser therapy subjected to laser therapy in addition to the standard institutional pain management protocol comprising of IV infusion/bolus of tramadol and paracetamol and fentanyl bolus as rescue analgesic. Pain intensity was measured by Verbal Rating Scale (VRS). The laser therapy was scheduled as once a day regime for three consecutive postoperative days (PODs) starting on POD 1, 30 min following tracheal extubation. The subsequent laser applications were also scheduled at the same time of the day as on day 1 if VRS was ≥5. 10 W Class IV laser was applied over 150 cm² sternal wound area for 150 s. VRS was used to assess pain severity and was recorded for statistical analysis using Friedman Test. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation [SD]) VRS of all the 100 patients just before application of the first dose of laser was 7.31 (0.94) while on MMT; the same fell to 4.0 (1.279) and 3.40 (2.697) at 1 h and 24 h respectively following first dose of laser. The change of VRS over first 24 h among all the 100 patients was statistically significant (P = 0.000). Laser was re-applied in 40 patients whose VRS was ≥5 (mean [SD] - 6.38 [0.868]) at 24th h. After receiving the 2nd dose of laser the VRS scores fell significantly (P = 0.000) and became 0 at 54th h. No patients required 3rd dose of the laser. No patient required rescue analgesic while on laser therapy. CONCLUSION: Class IV laser can be an effective technique for postoperative analgesia following OPCABG surgery through sternotomy when included as a component of MMA technique.

Clinical efficacy of low level laser therapy in reducing pain and swelling after periapical surgery: a preliminary report / Eficacia clínica de láser terapéutico de bajo nivel de emisión en la reducción de dolor e inflamación posterior a cirugía periapical: reporte preliminar

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the low level laser therapy (LLLT) in postoperative pain and swelling associated with periapical surgery. A double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial was carried out in 2 groups of 10 patients each, undergoing periapical surgery. The experimental group was treated with an intraoral application of an 810 nm-GaAsAl-laser, having an output power of 100 mW, with overlapping movements over the wound. In the control group, the same procedure was carried out, without therapeutic laser activation. Postoperative pain, swelling, and rescue medication were registered. The experimental group exhibited a decrease in pain intensity after periapical surgery compared with control group (p<0.05). There was not significant statistical difference between the groups in terms of swelling. Six patients of the control group required rescue medication. The use of LLLT in the postoperative management of patients having periapical surgery, using the protocol of this study reduced postoperative pain...

El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la eficacia del láser terapéutico de bajo nivel de emisión (LTBNE) en el dolor postoperatorio e inflamación asociados con cirugía periapical. Se realizó un ensayo clínico controlado aleatorizado doble ciego en 2 grupos de 10 pacientes cada uno, que requirieron de cirugía periapical. El grupo experimentalfue tratado con una aplicación intraoral de laser de GaAsAl de 810 nm, con una potencia de 100 Mw, con movimientos oscilatorios sobre la herida quirúrgica. En el grupo control, se llevó a cabo el mismo procedimiento, sin la activación del láser terapéutico. Se registraron dolor postoperatorio, inflamación y medicación de rescate. El grupo experimental mostró una disminución en la intensidad del dolor posterior a la cirugía periapical en comparacióncon el grupo control (p<0.05). No se encontró diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre los grupos entérminos de inflamación. Seis pacientes del grupo control requirieron medicación de rescate. El uso de LTBNE en el manejo postoperatorio de pacientes sometidos a cirugíaperiapical, usando el protocolo del presente estudio redujo el dolor postoperatorio...